Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lurker who wrote (48499)	2/21/1998 11:49:00 PM
From: Brendan2012	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

There's a big difference between the Iomega case and that one, though. Negligence does happen, and I don't think anyone here wants to eliminate lawyers. There are legitimate cases out there, and that one of Ron's sounds like it may be one of them (from what he said). I don't think you should be calling Ron lawyer sleaze without any evidence--you don't know what % he took on that case anyway. However, this case against Iomega appears, on the surface, to be very weak and just another example of a lawsuit-happy society. This suit against Iomega looks like it's from people who can't take responsibility for their own action, and any self-respecting lawyer shouldn't take such a case. Brendan