Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bonefish who wrote (1512563)	1/11/2025 5:33:03 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570636

Bonefish, The money went to areas that would benefit Democrats. The AP article already addressed that complaint: apnews.com ***** Some of the Center for Tech and Civic Life’s founders were once involved with the New Organizing Institute, which provided training to liberal activists. Conservative groups have argued that the funds disproportionately went to Democratic-leaning counties in key states, including Pennsylvania. But election officials have said there is no indication of favoritism in how the money was distributed, according to previous AP reports. The board of the Center for Tech and Civic Life also includes Pam Anderson, a Republican and former elected clerk of a suburban Denver-area county. Republican election officials have also vouched for the program’s impartiality, including Brian Mead, a Republican election director in Licking County, Ohio. ***** In any case, if that $200M "unfairly tilted the election" toward Brandon, then the $1B that went to Harris should have guaranteed a victory for her. Of course, to you that only means Trump won by such a YUGE margin, that his awesomeness alone overcame all of the attempts by the Democrats to "rig" the election. Tenchusatsu