Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. (GRNO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles A. King who wrote (8807)	2/23/1998 12:21:00 AM
From: Eric Hathaway	Respond to of 13091

Charles, Ron & all, I mentioned Rich Coast the other day, and have done some additional reading, most importantly this: sec.gov A 10 minute scan brought forth (in rough numbers): 1) They are proposing a reverse split 2) 17.7 +- mm shares outstanding, but insiders hold currently exercizable options for another 5.5 mm at prices between .18 and .25 3) CEO owns 20%, Pres 12.7, all directors & officers = 31% of outstanding shares (little chance of the reverse split NOT being approved) Another guy has an option to buy 3.6mm shares at .30. good for another 8 years Their revenues are increasing nicely, but this looks like a trap to me. Eric

To: Charles A. King who wrote (8807)	2/23/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: Charles A. King	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13091

Response from yesterday's poll: 29 responded; one very negative, 4 negative, 7 neutral, 11 positive , 6 very positive. Ratings were strong bulls 71.43% and 54.55% overall bulls. This is down from last December 3's poll when strong bulls were 73.33% and overall bulls were 72.72%, but considering what we have been through, I think sentiment is holding up extremely well. Message 2875605 The above definitions of bulls are found on the Stockmaster site. My definition of strong bulls would be very positive responses divided by total overall responses = 20.7% versus 56.5% last time and overall bulls would be positive plus very positive votes divided by total responses = 58.6% versus 82.6% last Dec 3. These slippages don't surprise me at all. What surprised me was that there were 29 people who read all the way down to the bottom of that post on a Sunday afternoon and then responded. Charles