Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brooks Jackson who wrote (3283)	2/22/1998 3:06:00 PM
From: jeffbas	Respond to of 78497

I spent some time looking through Mr. Barron's lists on this thread for that stock, but could not find it. Maybe that was a joke.

To: Brooks Jackson who wrote (3283)	2/23/1998 9:40:00 AM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78497

Brooks Jackson: I'm in the odd position of noticing that in my two purchases of this stock, I can see the stock jump 1/4 and 1/2 based just on my choice of limit orders fills. I am talking here about very small amounts of stock buying moving the price up. I've not yet brought my purchases up to a reasonable tiny amount, so if I did repeat the name, I'd be increasing the chances of competing at least 1/4 or « point with any other buyer who showed up. Frankly, I'm sorry now I mentioned this one at all. It appears like I'm lying or teasing people - that's really not my intent. Just trying to recap and demonstrate that IMO there are still many opportunities that people might find in undervalued stocks -if they would be patient and look and/or try to pick up on from the stock ideas mentioned here - some by people with very good records (not me -g-). And IMO, these opportunities are much safer than getting distracted and saying heck with it, time to focus on something to short or put.