SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1515335)1/22/2025 9:42:21 PM
From: Maple MAGA 5 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo
longz
Mick Mørmøny
tntpal

  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1583339
 
Tench, have you ever considered professional intervention? You are the most Musk obsessed person on Si, possibly the world. You are so MUSK obsessed the Si search engine stops at October 2024.

TENCH on MUSK siliconinvestor.com

Your go-to phrase has evolved over the years...

TENCH on Liberals siliconinvestor.com




To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1515335)1/23/2025 3:05:40 AM
From: Maple MAGA 1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583339
 
I believe Trump is appointed by GOD, throughout history, many leaders have claimed divine selection to legitimize their authority and inspire loyalty.

I don't see anything that disqualifies Trump, GOD even spoke 9 audible words to Brumar and he isn't much of a human being, but who is?

GOD's grace is open to all, even a miscreant like yourself.

Examples of Leaders Claiming Divine Selection
  1. Ancient Kings and Emperors:

    • Pharaohs of Egypt: Believed to be gods or chosen by the gods.
    • Mesopotamian Kings: Often claimed divine endorsement through omens or sacred texts.
    • Chinese Emperors: Mandate of Heaven justified their rule, linking them to divine will.
    • European Monarchs: Many claimed the "Divine Right of Kings," a theological justification for rule as God’s chosen representative.


  2. Religious Leaders:

    • Prophets in the Bible (Moses, David, etc.): Claimed direct anointing or selection by God.
    • Caliphs in Islam: Successors of Muhammad often tied their leadership to divine authority.
    • Theocracies: Leaders like Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran combined political and religious claims of divine favour.


  3. Modern Political Leaders:

    • Napoleon Bonaparte: Had himself crowned by the Pope to emphasize divine sanction.
    • King Haile Selassie of Ethiopia: Revered as God’s chosen by Rastafarians.
    • Some contemporary figures: Occasionally cite divine calling, particularly in highly religious societies.
Scriptural Basis for Claims of Divine Selection

Religious texts often provide examples of divine selection, though interpretations vary. Some key examples:
  1. In the Bible:

    • Old Testament: God anoints leaders like Moses (Exodus 3:10), Saul, and David (1 Samuel 16:1-13).
    • New Testament: Jesus says to Pilate, "You would have no authority over me unless it had been given you from above" (John 19:11), implying God ordains authority.
    • Romans 13:1: Paul writes, "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God."


  2. In the Quran:

    • Leaders and prophets like Muhammad are divinely guided, as indicated in verses like Surah Al-Imran (3:26): "You give sovereignty to whom You will and take sovereignty away from whom You will."


  3. Other Religious Texts:

    • Hindu texts like the Bhagavad Gita describe divine appointment of rulers (Krishna advises Arjuna on his duty as a leader).
    • Buddhist traditions often connect rulers to karmic merit or divine intervention (e.g., Ashoka the Great).
Analysis of the Claims
  • Religious Justification: Many leaders use divine claims to unify people under a higher purpose, often supported by religious doctrines or cultural traditions.
  • Cultural Perception: In deeply religious societies, these claims resonate with followers, granting leaders authority and legitimacy.
  • Criticism and Controversy: Critics argue these claims are sometimes used as tools for manipulation or to suppress dissent.