To: bull_dozer who wrote (210705 ) 1/29/2025 9:29:54 PM From: TobagoJack Respond to of 217544 >> THE F*CKING F*CKS From behind paywall zerohedge.com PREMIUM"This Time Is Different?" - Top Goldman Trader Asks "What Causes Most Pain From Here" BY TYLER DURDEN THURSDAY, JAN 30, 2025 - 01:05 AM"This time is different?" asks Goldman Sachs trader/strategist Paolo Schiavone, as he reflect on what happens next after two years of 25% gains... [url=] [/url] The starting point is two years of 25% returns in the SPX. However, that 25% figure does not tell the full story. Technology stocks have underperformed since July, prompting investors to shift further away in the risk frontier.Moving further out of their comfort zone, investors transitioned into AI application and second derivatives names like Vistra or Constellation yday down c30%. [url=] [/url] Smaller stocks, which saw valuations increase tenfold to become large-cap stocks, have gained liquidity but lack that same liquidity during downturns. The risk lies in a significant selloff among these peripheral names . What if substantial equity supply is offer by the end of the week as CIOs/Risk management re-asses their exposure to a concentrated investment?Realized volatility is an additional constrain when the cost of leverage in NQH5 is high. If NVDA experienced a 52% decline in 2022, it wouldn’t surprise you that Carvana dropped 97% in the same year.This highlights how reflexivity in large-cap names can be amplified when liquidity dries up, especially in low liquid small names. Looking back, in 2000, Maersk gained 30%, and Boeing added approximately 25%. The question is whether investor here show a preference for safety/ defensive/ bonds and even cyclicals.What causes the most pain from here is a 25% correction in the Nasdaq. However, such a scenario seems unlikely based on the current state of the U.S. economy: U.S. real final demand in the private sector growing at 3% for the last three years. GDP has been growing at around 3% for the past nine quarters. The most significant hiking cycle (from 0% to 5%) had minimal impact on the economy. Household debt as a percentage of GDP has declined from 100% to around 70%, with leverage concentrated in government debt. U.S. credit metrics are improving, as evidenced by SYF, COF, DFS, AXP, and ALLY charge-offs and delinquency data. Owner-Equivalent Rent (OER) should act as a tailwind for disinflation, potentially pulling the front end of the curve lower. Overall, assuming that “the government can always borrow because they make the rules,” there appear to be limited themes left in U.S. rates apart from my highest conviction the great steepening. For example, the SFRZ6/US30Y spread can get to 250bps... [url=] [/url]In U.S. rates, “10s are excessively expensive on the curve - profits will only come if the Fed cuts aggressively. Therefore, the best strategy is to focus on the front end if you expect this scenario.” The most interesting rates market, however, is Japan.