Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Hurricane and Severe Weather Tracking -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jazzlover2 who wrote (25318)	2/19/2025 2:41:18 AM
From: nicewatch	Respond to of 25996

My apology for late reply, this got lost in the shuffle. People still feed data into said AI models. Imo your "Terminator" SKYNET scenario is still a long way off if ever but could get frictionally close in our lifetimes in terms of autonomous AI armed drones which we can hope the major powers never allow deployed even though already being researched and tested! -gulp- Weather forecasts are all about accuracy and then precision much like fine timekeeping. Bad models should fail much sooner in that pursuit with or without AI. It likely gets more troubling with longer term climate predictive models that some overweight and often rely on conceptually flawed closed models of climate change systems, as it were. The GIGO model, that is Garbage in, garbage out. en.wikipedia.org Old climate clowns like failed hockey stick "modeler" Michael Mann would likely use terms like "settled science", and "the majority of climate scientists say!". Just for example. :-) Nevertheless, I remain bullish on increased sensor technology and AI to improve short to mid range weather forecasts. And as stated earlier, the storm(s) of the century have variances too wide for AI to model better in the near term. At least as I understand the vanguard of current technology and software modeling.