Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bull_dozer who wrote (210778)	1/31/2025 10:38:24 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 217544

Message 35005899 heads up Re <<This would hand roughly $2,500 per month to the typical American family. It would raise growth and lower inflation. And it would hollow out China as companies flood to produce in the US.>> :0) yeup, deficit spending would raise growth and lower inflation, and better, instead of just dropping income to zero, surely making income tax a negative percentage is even better, meaning raising more growth and lowering more inflation :0) as to << hollow out China >>, yeup, supply chains can be excised ... over a 40+ years period, assuming Team China does not react to act, and further assuming there are literate folks and robots in US to make stuff cheaper and better then in China China China ... you know, how DeepSeek is emptied out by ChatGPT or some such :0) 40+ years is definitely on the other side of the demographic flip of 2042 Another thingy, that the 'typical' American family absolutely does not pay $2,500 per month in income tax, a small detail, because 40% of American families do NOT pay any income tax statista.com.