Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Point and Figure Charting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ms. X who wrote (988)	2/22/1998 7:05:00 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34816

Dear Jan: Thanx much for the cool list! mph

To: Ms. X who wrote (988)	2/24/1998 2:43:00 AM
From: Paul V.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34816

P&F-Madness, When I look at AMAT I see we are at a double top at $38 with price variation occuring in the noise area of $38-35 range. The bull support level looks to be to be at $33. It is Bull Confirmed66+, R/S @ Buy, R/S Col @ O, Trend @ +, P&F @ Buy, Momentum @ +, with 6 wks momentum. Since it has broken the bear resistance level at $38, IMO, if it breaks the double top at $39 it looks to me that it will get an upward ride. When I use the horizontal method of calculation I come with 14 total colums of X & O's times 3 equal 42 points. These added to the low base of 26 gives us a estimated top price of $68. Vertically, IMO, I see nine X's before it broke the downturn which occured in December when it moved from $35 to $26. Nine X's time 3 equals 27. Added to $26 we then have a vertical count of $53. Therefore, IMO, we have an potential AMAT range from $53-$68. Are my calculations accurate? P&F-Madness, has Tom come to any decision as to which method of projection is the most accurate? Thanks, Paul V.