Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Profits who wrote (28662)	2/22/1998 10:40:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572507

Profits, <[Paul's] work has been documented as being Shitty in a book!> After several years of "successive" investing (smartly holding his Intel shares), Paul become a little delusional and now insists that it was not him, and this loss of $8M in Intel profits was not his fault:) As you know from the Tim Jackson book (ISBN 052594141x, sold everywhere for below $25), he paid Intel back by covering their insurance fraud... Intel is very good company indeed;)

To: Profits who wrote (28662)	2/23/1998 12:29:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572507

ProfitsBob - Re: "maybe yields we're initially low at Fab 25 because you installed some of the equipment? " Yep - that was me - I installed all the equipment in MegaFLop 25 as an Intel Undercover Counterespionage Dirty Tricks Team Member. Blame the yield problems on me. Blame them on Yousef. Blame them on Stockman. It could never be AMD's fault. No, No, Never. Not ever. No Way. I hear the yields are now uo to 70% at Fab 25. Your information must be old. Paul