Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1521404)	2/10/2025 3:42:53 PM
From: Wharf Rat	1 Recommendation Recommended By Eric Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1584599

"Science deals with what is most likely" What's most likely has been known for a while; our FF emissions will cause the temperature to increase. We're still not sure by how much, but the IPCC temperature range is still pretty much the same as Arrhenius, in 1896; 1.5-5 degrees C for a doubling of CO2, from 280-560 ppm. 1.5 is out; we've been over that for more than a year, and CO2 is "only" 425 ppm. January 2025 was the warmest January ever recorded. Last month was 1.75°C above the pre-industrial level and 0.79°C above the 1991-2020 average. The persistence of high temp. underscores significant climate trends. Read the full #C3S Climate Bulletins: https://t.co/PCInDl2rNO pic.twitter.com/jzuTxlkWwQ — Copernicus ECMWF (@CopernicusECMWF) February 6, 2025 Cosmic rays have been studied, as has almost anything else you can come up with. cosmic rays not global warming - Google Search -- "We are sliding into the next Ice Age per the Milankovitch cycles" Yes, we should be in a very slow decrease, but, instead, we're having a rapid increase "We should really also study outcomes if a sudden cooling trend sets in" That will take a super-volcano, a very big space pebble, or an all-out nuclear war.