Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: didjuneau who wrote (224131)	2/10/2025 8:49:36 PM
From: didjuneau	Respond to of 224705

Boomerang Coming: Anti-Trump Federal Judge Rules FBI Must Provide Mar-a-Lago “Classified Documents” Material to FOIA Lawsuit The bottom line was that President Trump’s legal team were never able to ascertain exactly what the “documents marked classified” actually were. That aspect of the case was pure Lawfare, and actually quite silly. The DOJ was saying Trump had “documents with classification markings.” Trump saying, “no I didn’t have classified documents, but if true what where they?” And the DOJ saying, “we can’t tell you, that’s classified.” It was silly and never reconciled in part because the case was dismissed. Well…. now Judge Beryl Howell is telling the DOJ/FBI to produce the “documents with classification markings,” and all surrounding information therein, to Jason Leopold, because Trump bad and the information will make the public hate him, or something [ SEE Court Order]. But again, no-one knows what these “documents with classification markings” actually were…. Except, well, maybe us. We have well-based circumstantially supported suspicions. { see here} Will the Trump DOJ (now Pam Bondi) and the Trump FBI (likely Kash Patel) release the files and material to Jason Leopold, as demanded by Judge Howell? I think there’s a strong possibility they will, which then begs the question: ….If the documents were of such critical national security value, then why would the “documents with classification markings” be released under the auspices of a simple FOIA claim? lolol… See the stupidity of it?