Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (211253)	2/12/2025 6:15:01 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218898

I see things a bit differently. Allegations can easily be checked and disproven, as is the case with the dreaded Samantha Powers. And many others. Particularly when they do not meet the smell test. And the allegations against her seem skunk-like. Why would a bright woman with a spectacular education whose husband makes a lot of money, who is obligated to file public and substantial financial disclosures, ruin her career, risk criminal liability, etc., for the sake of money, especially as she doesn't seem to need it or has never grasped at it? Doesn't make sense, does it? Bears looking into, out of simple human fairness. Even though I thoroughly disagree with who she is and what she has done. The cursory examination I gave it suggested that Elon's claim was total male bovine manure. I'm disappointed because he probably knows better. I feel that we all have (or should feel) a duty to the truth. Spreading an unjustified allegation, or one which does not survive the most cursory examination, violates that duty, especially if it defames someone. We will make mistakes, but hopefully not because we have been sloppy in our thinking or in our writing. Or because we choose to purposefully ignore the glaringly obvious.