Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (1522950)	2/15/2025 11:51:59 AM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570973

Is that the very best drivel you can come up with? I could move on from Popper if you like, but you have to understand what he said first. from the same source. << While he criticized sociology for often lacking testable hypotheses, he didn’t dismiss its potential to become scientific in the future. Popper thought that sociology could develop in a more scientific direction by focusing on creating theories that are open to falsification. For example, rather than making broad, unfalsifiable claims (like "society always maintains stability"), sociologists could propose specific predictions that could be tested against evidence, such as "*crime rates rise when unemployment increases*." By moving towards such testable statements, sociology could meet the criteria for scientific inquiry.>>