Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1523117)	2/15/2025 9:35:53 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570497

No, you have avoided what I posted entirely. Here are the relevant quotations that need review. "Gavin Schmidt of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies says the paper contains egregious errors The sun-Earth distance does not vary with the motion of the sun-Earth system around the barycentre of the sun-Jupiter system, nor the sun-galactic centre system or any other purely mathematical reference point,” he says. Incorrect. The Sun earth distance will vary (be perturbed) by other major planets. A plain lie as I see it. Ken Rice of the University of Edinburgh, UK, criticised the paper for an “elementary” mistake about celestial mechanics. “It’s well known that the sun moves around the barycentre of the solar system due to the influence of the other solar system bodies, mainly Jupiter,” he says. “This does not mean, as the paper is claiming, that this then leads to changes in the distance between the sun and the Earth.” etc etc. Incorrect. The Sun earth distance will vary (be perturbed) by other major planets. Another plain lie as I see it. If my statements above are true, yes, it is a big deal. A really, really, big deal because it exposes what these guys are up to. "Misinformation" does not cover it.