Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1524090)	2/19/2025 4:58:28 PM
From: Wharf Rat	2 Recommendations Recommended By rdkflorida2 Tenchusatsu Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578305

“You learn a lot from mishaps and the investigation" Who investigates? The people who Elmo fired. How many new investigations since 1/20? They're getting stretched way too thin. Musk helped fire hundreds of FAA workers. Now, his ... Yahoo 1 day ago — The move to bring in more experts within Musk's circle follows the Trump administration's decision to fire hundreds of Federal Aviation ...

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1524090)	2/19/2025 5:17:22 PM
From: Eric	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578305

But Joseph says how the plane ended upside down will still need to be explained Oh this is easy. Any pilot or any one who studied aerodynamics would know the answer in a heartbeat. The right wing broke off. Left wing still attached and was providing half the lift to support the aircraft. It immediately lifted up and rotated the fuselage on the fore and aft longitudinal line until it contacted the ground on the right side of the of the upside down aircraft. If both wings had remained attached it would not have rotated. :) Elementary dear Watson!