To: Falcon who wrote (35944 ) 2/23/1998 10:11:00 AM From: sepku Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 61433
>>>We should be able to see this, but then again, look who's running the country, and unfortunately the armed forces, Bubba hasnt a clue as to foreign relations...and that is evident by the lack of allied support. Bush and Reagan never had trouble getting support. But I guess when your more concerned with meeting with your intern, these things are bound to happen.<<< LOL! Another gullible soul sucked into partyline politics. I could care less what party a president belongs to, only the job he does. You're just another republican sore over the fact that the economy is in its best shape for 26 years, nationwide crime is falling, and the majority of Americans are pleased with where the nation is headed. Translation: you have no core issues to raise in the 2000 elections. What Clinton does in personal life is his business, and as long as he does his job well, then he is fulfilling what he was elected to do. Your nosy talk-show watching minority, Kenneth Starr, and the tabloids, need to get your own lives and stay the hell out of the man's bedroom. This assumption that the President should be held to a higher code of ethics is ridiculous. There are no higher levels of morality, there is just a bottom and a top. Because he is human, he is as vulnerable to the same temptations as you or I. Don't hold ANYONE to immaculate moral perfection until you have attained this yourself. I believe the following words of wisdom apply here:"Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone." Oh, and while you were worrying about high school graduation, I was in Dhahran when Iraqi forces first rolled into Kuwait. Bush got us into this 8 year stalemate by not finishing the job when the opportunity was ripe. And attempting to draw a parallel between Reagan and Clinton's foreign policy is pointless, since the Cold War era required vastly different politics. You seriously are at a loss for facts. Style Pts.