Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (211951)	3/9/2025 12:46:07 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Respond to of 219956

March 9, 2025 by John Hinderaker in Gaza A Realistic Future For Gaza France, Germany, Italy and the U.K. are now backing the Egyptian/Arab plan to rebuild Gaza at a cost of $53 billion, while leaving the Gazans in place. This proposal is touted as a “realistic” alternative to President Trump’s “Middle East Riviera” concept. Perhaps I am an outlier here, but I am not in favor of any plan to rebuild Gaza at the expense of others. Should Gaza’s attempted genocide really be rewarded with $53 billion in other people’s money? I think Gazans need to learn the lesson that it is a bad idea to start a war, and lose it. The burden should be on them to build some kind of normal economy, and actually do productive work instead of living on global welfare. Their sad enclave should be reconstructed only to the extent they can pay for it, and are willing to prioritize construction over terrorism. There is no track record to suggest that Gazans, given the opportunity, will do anything so rational. In the meantime, they should live with the consequences of their own sadistic folly, unaided by others.