Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jean1057 who wrote (2318)	2/23/1998 1:28:00 PM
From: DKR	Respond to of 27311

When the Red Chip Review starts beating the various benchmarks, I will start paying attention...Lev Dawson may have accomplished his goal, he has established a floor by weeding out the non-believers, and stripping away the residue of the Cal Reed era. As for the various comments about the need for more "PR", I could care less about "PR", I was pleased that LD did not come off like PT Barnum. Sure a little spin-doctoring could have pushed the stock through $8 but then what? We would have seen a slow painful drift lower...

To: jean1057 who wrote (2318)	2/23/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Any reason? No, no reason why Red Chip should be right with their sell recommendation. However, if Red Chip feels they were mis-lead in the conversations that must have gone on prior to their published review, then perhaps it's not surprising they'd update their analysis with a sell recommendation. Kind'a the results of having a bad taste placed in the mouth by LD's bombshell, me thinks. BUT, I haven't yet seen the article so I'm assuming the thread gossip of a sell recommendation by Red Chip is, in fact, true. John~