SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1528555)3/11/2025 2:48:57 PM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Tenchusatsu

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578552
 
"I don't think I'd trust any of my generative AI needs to Grok"




To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1528555)3/11/2025 2:51:57 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578552
 
>> Well, you seem to be proof that Musk feels no need to spend anything on cybersecurity.

Musk has not said that.

But I clearly stated my view that the attack WAS mitigated. The state-of-the-art, AFAIK, does not mean that DDOS can be prevented, as much as they can be mitigated, and mitigation is what occurred.

There exists no mitigation strategy that can prevent all DDoS attacks with certainty. You can do things to reduce the likelihood of a persistent attack (like Musk does at Twitter) but at this time there is no mitigation that can guarantee DDOS attacks to fail. Every system known has limitations in system resources, and attackers can use a variety of approaches that scale and change as needed. This is not anything new.

You can minimize the likelihood of success but you cannot guarantee it. Musk is already doing those things AFAIK. If you were willing to spend more money and vastly over-provision your systems you might slow it down, but reality is someone is eventually going to defeat that, too.

This is a silly argument. You MUST realize you are wrong and be just trying to keep it going.