Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (1523)	2/23/1998 1:59:00 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Respond to of 6528

Wrong Smartin, because of your short interest in RMIL you complained constantly to the SEC in getting them to place a temporary 10 day halt. Once the company satisfied your concerns to the SEC, the SEC removed the halt and the company now controls when trading shall resume There are a number of problems with the above: 1. You say that martin has a short interest in RMIL. That has yet to be proven. 2. The SEC does not halt trading because of investor complaints. The SEC halts trading when the SEC has reason to believe it is in the public's best interest to do so. Case in point: SEC currently checking out BAAT. Halted? Nope. 3. The SEC letting the halt expire does not constitute an SEC endorsement of the company, nor proof that there is no wrong-doing, nor "satisfaction" that everything's okay. 10-day halts simply expire when 10 days have elapsed. Therefore, the SEC did not "remove" the halt. 4. The company does not control when trading will resume. The MMs control that. Until they make a market, trading does not happen.