Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcher who wrote (212422)	3/22/2025 3:09:41 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 219174

Re <<boeing F-47>> I am told that F-47 especially by boeing shall be very good for planetary peace, I shall remain agnostic and watch & brief The get-go seems good, as far as fantasy-gushes go

To: marcher who wrote (212422)	3/22/2025 3:37:47 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219174

Re <<boeing F-47>> the PowerPoint / concept art / chitter-chatter is so far of less merit than the J-36 / J-50 that has been seen-seen flying-flying. We wait to see if one or the other team going into a technological cul-de-sac Say J-36 is neither a fight nor a bomber, but an flying weapons platform to takedown fighters and bombers and their support planes that be awacs and refueling planes The Trump says the F-47 first flew 5 years ago, meaning when he was in charge; maybe yes perhaps no. F-47 for the 47th president; yeup. Suggested that BA is a good short.