Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (48577)	2/23/1998 4:59:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

Paul, bait. For those that aren't jumping in the boat, there's another method: dynamite 'em. I understand it's popular in the South among the "good 'ol boys." I think you're using a bit of it today. Tony

To: Paul Engel who wrote (48577)	2/23/1998 5:18:00 PM
From: Keith Ferguson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, You think Paul F. is still in the market?? I'd figure he was broke by now.

To: Paul Engel who wrote (48577)	2/23/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: Frank Louie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, Great post! Smoking gun on Paul Fiondella's stock shorts. You are very prolific today in your post responses and also biting! As a longtime SI reader of the Intel thread, I want to thank you for sharing your technical knowledge and analyses with everyone on this thread. I am also a longterm Intel investor and retired like you. Have you ever thought of writing an Intel investor's newsletter and rake in the bucks? Frank

To: Paul Engel who wrote (48577)	2/23/1998 11:17:00 PM
From: Paul Fiondella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

So where in those posts is anything about shorting at 69? That's the one which you made up and harp on. So when are you going to admit you made it up. And where in your posts is anything as honest as what I have to say about my positions. You never tell anybody what you are doing with your positions or even what they are. In my book that gives you no credibility and certainly no room to criticize other people. That's why I bring up the actions attributed to you in Intel Insider. You have a real serious problem with character. Does Intel pay you to post here?