Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Heart Attacks, Cancer and strokes. Preventative approaches -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stan who wrote (39143)	4/8/2025 2:42:42 AM
From: ig	2 Recommendations Recommended By Kirk © pheilman_ Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39304

Grok is more exhaustive. In my samples, it incorporates recent queries in its current responses noticeably more than ChatGPT does. Grok makes quite a point of acknowledging salient words or phrases in your prompt, making sure you're both on the same page. The more I use Grok, the more I like it. Just a few minutes ago I asked it to explain the latest scientific thinking on muscle hypertrophy, which is harder and harder to achieve as we age. Here it is: --- Me: I have often heard it said that hypertrophy comes from damaging the muscle a bit so that it heals back larger. But today I heard that hypertrophy isn't the result of tissues recovering from damage, but from sustained tension. Grok: You’ve stumbled into a fascinating debate in exercise science! The idea that muscle hypertrophy (growth) comes from "damaging" the muscle, which then repairs itself bigger and stronger, has been a popular theory for a long time. It’s tied to the concept of microtears in muscle fibers caused by intense exercise, especially eccentric contractions (when the muscle lengthens under load, like lowering a dumbbell). The repair process, driven by inflammation and satellite cell activation, was thought to add more protein and size to the muscle. It’s a compelling story, and there’s some evidence—like studies showing muscle damage markers (e.g., creatine kinase) spike after heavy lifting—that supports it. But the "sustained tension" idea you heard today is part of a newer, more nuanced view that’s gaining traction. This perspective emphasizes mechanical tension—how much force a muscle generates over time—as the primary driver of hypertrophy, rather than damage itself. The thinking is that tension stimulates signaling pathways (like mTOR) that tell the muscle to grow, even without significant tearing. Research, like studies on time under tension and progressive overload, shows you can build muscle with controlled, sustained effort—think slow reps or heavy isometric holds—without necessarily trashing the tissue. Damage might just be a byproduct, not the main event. So, what’s the truth? Probably a bit of both, depending on context. Damage can contribute, especially in intense or novel workouts, by triggering repair processes that add size. But tension alone, if applied consistently and progressively, seems sufficient to drive growth—look at powerlifters or gymnasts who get huge without chasing soreness. The body’s a clever beast; it adapts to what you throw at it. Want to dig deeper into the studies or just hash out what this means for your training?