Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Qone0 who wrote (91040)	4/17/2025 12:31:21 PM
From: ajtj99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97211

Yeah, you're right. Here's some thoughts on contempt of court and how that could wind its way through the judiciary: axios.com Basically, the Constitution assumes Congress will act if a President ignores court orders, either beginning impeachment hearings or passing legislation to enforce the court order. It's a gray area when you have a President who just says screw it to any and all remedies ordered by a court. That would leave impeachment and a successful Senate trial and conviction as a remedy, which has almost zero chance of happening.

To: Qone0 who wrote (91040)	4/17/2025 12:34:26 PM
From: ajtj99	Respond to of 97211

I think if the Court of International Trade decision, not injunction, was appealed to the Supreme Court and the plaintiffs won, it would have sufficient leverage to cause compliance by the President. Most of the US population would support compliance, and the TV Show's ratings would drop even more with non-compliance, so that may be a way to force compliance.