Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1534321)	4/18/2025 12:01:42 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 Eric Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575761

Joachim, You cite Ayn Rand only when you think it helps your point, then call her wrong the moment she doesn’t. Classic cherry-picking. I called her wrong because she IS wrong on certain points. No one is infallible. You are of the opinion that either someone is 100% right or someone is 100% wrong. Calling someone an “anti-vaxxer” for questioning one vaccine’s necessity, effectiveness, or political baggage is as lazy as it is dishonest. Oh, so now it's just "one vaccine"? LOL ... Either way, you are ignoring the science behind even that "one vaccine." Like you said, you seem to think science means goose stepping behind whatever some nutty professor pontificates, as long as it’s been peer-reviewed by like-minded nutty professors. (https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=35107700) The hypocrisy behind your accusation is obvious. Doesn't matter if you are against many vaccines or just "one vaccine." Either way, you are exactly what you accuse others of being. Tenchusatsu