Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: docsox who wrote (1717)	2/24/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Goulds	Respond to of 7054

John Chew, Would you please send me your email address? Your current one on file in your personality profile is apparently obsolete. Thank you very much. DaveF

To: docsox who wrote (1717)	2/24/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: Dan Packer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

This is a jump ball ~ A TAD question: If a company in South Korea makes a deal to buy some semiconductor equipment from the US - say from MRS - decides to use TADs, does it go this way? => They agree to the deal. ROK, Inc. arranges for the TAD. ACRT pays MRS. ROK gets the machine. Then the Won does a swan. ROK can't pay off the TAD. Do they return the machine to MRS? Return it to ACRT? Keep it and pay off the TAD in fractional Won? Keep it, reorganize under the bankruptcy statutes of ROK? And stiff ACRT and their TAD? Or we could do the reverse. If the Won does a Swan, can you keep the TAD on?