To: The Barracuda™  who wrote (1949 ) 5/1/2025 4:11:40 PM From: Gib Bogle     Respond to    of 2027  Doomberg has written about the important role of large spinning turbines in stabilising the grid:Spanish Flu     In January of 2024, we  published “ Inverted Priorities ,” an essay that warned of  an underappreciated risk posed by forcing intermittent renewable energy sources  onto pre-existing grids. We began that piece by noting that modern electricity  grids are classic non-linear systems susceptible to difficult-to-model  interdependencies that can lead to unexpected challenges for operators.  Traditional forms of generation—like coal, natural gas, and nuclear—provide an  embedded buffer against grid chaos: Large spinning turbines endow electricity  grids with the inertia to ride out minor fluctuations in frequency, reducing  the risk of butterflies causing hurricanes. Solar and wind offer no such  insurance, relying instead on inverters to deliver product to market.     We were hardly alone in  flagging this hazard—experts have been issuing similar warnings with varying  urgency for years. There are ways to offset such risks, of course, but doing so  requires significant upfront investments that make already-expensive forms of  electricity even more so, further straining the false narrative that renewables  are cheap. We closed our article as follows:     “In an ideal  world, enhanced fault ride-through requirements would have been imposed on  renewable energy projects before they were allowed to reach critical mass on  our grids, but the mad dash for public cash appears to have resulted in  systemic corner-cutting. Redundancy investments do not come cheap, and we  suspect the costs consumers will ultimately have to bear to abate this  foreseeable risk will be substantial.