Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Intrinsyc Software Inc. (T.ICS) (formerly V.ICS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hsg who wrote (192)	2/24/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: Sultan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1635

If the trend continues, it will be under a buck soon. There are better plays out there so I have decided to stay away, even for speculating purposes. Ofcourse, I reserve the right to reverse my position and do something foolish.

To: hsg who wrote (192)	2/24/1998 9:37:00 PM
From: Allan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1635

I've always been told by my discount brokerage that short positions are not allowed on the VSE... can someone please enlighten me??

To: hsg who wrote (192)	2/25/1998 5:24:00 PM
From: Codfish	Respond to of 1635

hsg, You write: >35+ employees? I heard it was a lot less. Can you confirm Bill? I checked the annual report and, on page 6, it notes: "....With a contingent of 35 as of December 1997, we continue to enjoy tremendous success in employing highly qualified people to develop, support, and expand our product line and customer base....." Seems 35 is the right number - at least as of Dec/97. You also note: >no news is hurting ICS I can't disagree with you on that point. Also, you asked: >Is it true (a friend who lost his shirt here told me the news came out yesterday) that ICS is under scrutiny for some filings (regulatory issue) - which is a typical story on the VSE? I checked with the company and got the following reply: "The financials for the quarter were listed last week as being late in filing because we forgot to sign the bottom of the page. This has been corrected." I hope that helps. Bill