SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (214542)5/27/2025 7:48:20 AM
From: Maple MAGA 2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Julius Wong
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219845
 
Mysteries of the Vancouver Lawyers

Canada lawyer under fire for submitting fake cases created by AI chatbot

Chong Ke, from Vancouver, under investigation after allegedly using ChatGPT to cite case law – but those cases did not exist

Leyland Cecco in Toronto

Thu 29 Feb 2024 20.10 GMT

A lawyer in Canada is under fire after the artificial intelligence chatbot she used for legal research created “fictitious” cases, in the latest episode to expose the perils of untested technologies in the courtroom.

The Vancouver lawyer Chong Ke, who now faces an investigation into her conduct, allegedly used ChatGPT to develop legal submissions during a child custody case at the British Columbia supreme court.

According to court documents, Ke was representing a father who wanted to take his children overseas on a trip but was locked in a separation dispute with the children’s mother. Ke is alleged to have asked ChatGPT for instances of previous case law that might apply to her client’s circumstances. The chatbot, developed by OpenAI, produced three results, two of which she submitted to the court.

The lawyers for the children’s mother, however, could not find any record of the cases, despite multiple requests.

When confronted with the discrepancies, Ke backtracked.

“I had no idea that these two cases could be erroneous. After my colleague pointed out the fact that these could not be located, I did research of my own and could not detect the issues either,” Ke wrote in an email to the court. “I had no intention to mislead the opposing counsel or the court and sincerely apologize for the mistake that I made.”

Despite the popularity of chatbots, which are trained on extensive troves of data, the programs are also prone to errors, known as “hallucinations”.

Lawyers representing the mother called Ke’s conduct “reprehensible and deserving of rebuke” because it led to “considerable time and expense” to determine if the cases she cited were real.

They asked for special costs to be awarded, but the judge overseeing the case rejected the request, saying such an “extraordinary step” would require “a finding of reprehensible conduct or an abuse of process” by the lawyer.

“Citing fake cases in court filings and other materials handed up to the court is an abuse of process and is tantamount to making a false statement to the court,” wrote Justice David Masuhara. “Unchecked, it can lead to a miscarriage of justice.”

He found that opposing counsel was “well-resourced” and had already produced “volumes” of materials in the case. “There was no chance here that the two fake cases would have slipped through.”




Colombian judge says he used ChatGPT in ruling

Read more

Masuhara said Ke’s actions produced “significant negative publicity” and she was “naive about the risks of using ChatGPT”, but he found she took steps to correct her errors.

“I do not find that she had the intention to deceive or misdirect. I accept the sincerity of Ms Ke’s apology to counsel and the court. Her regret was clearly evident during her appearance and oral submissions in court.”

Despite Masuhara’s refusal to award special costs, the law society of British Columbia is now investigating Ke’s conduct.

“While recognizing the potential benefits of using AI in the delivery of legal services, the Law Society has also issued guidance to lawyers on the appropriate use of AI, and expects lawyers to comply with the standards of conduct expected of a competent lawyer if they do rely on AI in serving their clients,” a spokesperson, Christine Tam, said in a statement.



Chong Ke
Family & Litigation Lawyer

Phone:
604-734-7911 ext. 375

Fax:
604-734-6366

Email:
cke@westsidefamilylaw.ca

Assistant

Name:
Samuel Chan

Phone:
604-734-6363

Email:
schan@westsidefamilylaw.ca

View profile

Chong Ke represents clients in the BC Supreme Court and Provincial Court and practices family law, civil litigation, and wills and estates law. She is a resolute litigator, a probing negotiator, and a creative problem-solver. She is equipped with outstanding advocacy skills and analytical skills. She understands the dynamics of a changing relationship and the intricacy of legal disputes. She pays attention to details without losing sight of the big picture. She conducts her practice to achieve the best possible results for her clients without incurring unnecessary expenses.

Before joining Westside Family Law, Chong articled and practiced at a boutique firm in Richmond serving clients from all walks of life. She successfully represented clients in negotiations, judicial or trial conferences, and pre-trial adjudications.

Prior to completing the J.D. program at UBC and the University of Ottawa, Chong received an LL.B. and an LL.M. from top law schools in China and a Ph.D. from the University of Victoria Faculty of Law. She passed the competitive bar examination in China.

Chong is a big believer of giving back to the community. She is a volunteer speaker at S.U.C.C.E.S. and a proud volunteer with Rise Women’s Legal Centre.

Chong assists clients with:
  • Pre-nuptial, marriage, property, separation & divorce agreements
  • Uncontested divorce (Desk Order Divorce)
  • Family law litigation
  • General civil litigation
  • Wills and estate planning
  • Probate and estate administration
  • Representation in negotiation, mediation or other alternative dispute resolution
Contact Us For a Consultation!



To: TobagoJack who wrote (214542)5/27/2025 7:34:16 PM
From: abuelita  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219845
 
looks fascinating Jay.

it seems to speak to the frailties of the human condition.
the immense ego of the one who had it constructed and
the extreme pettiness of the one who destroyed it.

on the other hand, there is the dedication and skill of those
who persevered to preserve it.

a mixed bag so to speak. :)