Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (214569)	5/28/2025 11:38:13 PM
From: Maple MAGA	2 Recommendations Recommended By maceng2 Mick Mørmøny Respond to of 218054

I appreciate your opinion, you live there, your observation and instincts are a hundred times more valid than mine. Thanks. From ChatGPT: Tommy Robinson, born Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, adopted his pseudonym to conceal his identity and protect his family amid threats related to his activism. He has also used aliases such as Andrew McMaster, Paul Harris, Wayne King, and Stephen Lennon. The name "Tommy Robinson" was inspired by a well-known member of the Luton Town football hooligan firm, the MIGs. Robinson stated that he used a pseudonym because discussing Islam publicly had led to threats against him, including plots to murder him. He explained, "I tried to protect my name, because I wanted to protect my family" . Good Law Project+17Wikipedia+17The Times+17 The Times Financially, Robinson has received substantial support from various sources, particularly in North America. In 2017, American billionaire Robert J. Shillman funded Robinson's fellowship at the Canadian website Rebel News, providing over $6,000 (£5,000) per month. The Middle East Forum, a U.S.-based think tank, contributed $60,000 (£47,000) towards his legal fees and organized rallies in his support. Additionally, Elon Musk reportedly agreed to cover Robinson's legal expenses, according to Robinson's representatives . The Times+1Wikipedia+1 Wikipedia POLITICO Despite declaring bankruptcy in 2021 with debts amounting to £2 million, Robinson continues to maintain a public presence and lifestyle, raising questions about the sources and management of his funds.

To: maceng2 who wrote (214569)	5/31/2025 8:46:18 PM
From: Maple MAGA	Respond to of 218054

UK: Pakistani drug dealer can stay in the country ‘to teach son about Islam’ May 31, 2025 5:00 pm By Robert Spencer 1 Comment Because making sure that people are taught about Islam is a top priority in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain today. How else will they adjust to life there when Britain becomes a Sharia state? “Pakistani drug dealer can stay in UK ‘to teach son about Islam,’” by Max Parry, Express, May 29, 2025: A judge ruled that a Pakistani drug dealer could not be deported as it would be “unduly harsh” on his son, whom he teaches “about Islam, about Pakistani culture and his own upbringing”. The Home Office ordered the deportation of Muhammad Asif Karim, 43, after he was convicted seven times for 21 offences, including supplying the Class A drugs heroin and cocaine, serving a four-year jail term. However, the foreign criminal appealed to the Upper Tribunal—an immigration and asylum court—and the judge agreed that under the right to a family life, set out by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, he should be permitted to stay in the UK to be with his son. This is despite the court hearing that the child is “largely brought up by his white British mother”. The boy gave evidence that his father “is able to talk to him about Islam, about Pakistani culture and his own upbringing”. The case is the latest in a long list where foreign criminals or illegal immigrants have been allowed to resist deportation and stay in Britain by appealing to the courts. The court heard that Karim, who has lived in the UK for 26 years, had avoided criminality for 10 years and enjoyed a “parental relationship” with his son. The tribunal accepted that the talks between the pair were “fundamental” to the boy’s identity. In response, the Home Office argued that that was nothing but “conjecture”, unsupported by corroboration from a social worker or psychologist. The tribunal ruled: “Although there is a particularly strong public interest in removing someone who habitually committed crimes over a 14-year period, his last offence was committed over 10 years ago and he has complied with all probation and rehabilitation requirements, as well as the reporting conditions imposed on him by the Home Office,” it said. “He has throughout the relevant period suffered from significant and debilitating mental ill-health, and although this was not a factor that the first-tier tribunal thought significant, it is right to note that there has been an inordinate delay – over 10 years – on the part of the Secretary of State in effecting this deportation. “There was also evidence that he was himself a survivor of violence, trauma and criminality, all of which had played a role in his troubled youth.”…