Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1540552)	5/29/2025 12:05:44 PM
From: Wharf Rat	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583508

"Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.” Like the right to marry the person of your choice? Like the right to dress like a woman and read books to kids in libraries? Like the right to have an abortion?

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1540552)	5/29/2025 1:07:13 PM
From: golfer72	3 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo longz Maple MAGA Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583508

StenchQ believes in guilty till proven innocent. I exposed him months ago with his "Deathsantis" comments so not surprised he doesn't like or respect the Constitution

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1540552)	5/29/2025 1:20:56 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583508

Joachim, You accuse others of failing to protect minorities, but your idea of “minority rights” seems to ignore the individual completely. That's a complete lie. I have always argued for the defense of INDIVIDUAL rights. Don't believe me? Tell me what you think should be done with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose INDIVIDUAL rights are being violated as we speak. He is falsely accused of being part of a violent gang, falsely accused of being a convicted criminal, and rendered to a foreign gulag. You say you're protecting individual rights, but the only individuals you care about are white nationalists like you. Every president tests constitutional limits, your hero Obama used executive orders like candy. Typical whataboutism, commonly used by people who cannot defend what they believe in. For the record, I have always been against Obama's abuse of executive orders. Unlike you, I don't have double standards. A constitutional republic is a form of representative democracy So according to your "logic," we are not a democracy. We are instead a representative democracy. Got it. In other words, your outrage does not entitle you to rewrite definitions, or history. If you want to defend liberty, start by defending the Constitution, not emotional tantrums disguised as moral high ground. Keep projecting. It's the only way you can live with your self-contradictions. Tenchusatsu P.S. - Still think your priest didn't deny the Holocaust?