SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bonefish who wrote (1540783)5/30/2025 7:56:10 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
sylvester80

  Respond to of 1586313
 
Bonefish,
I'm not the only one here that thinks you may be using some kind of Chat box.
That's because you guys are incapable of independent thought.

All you guys do is post one-liners for the "recommendations."

And you still haven't addressed the fact that Trump lied when he claimed that gas was $1.98/gallon.

Tenchusatsu



To: Bonefish who wrote (1540783)5/30/2025 8:05:33 PM
From: golfer72  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586313
 
LOL that would explain a lot. For "his" sake I hope these aren't his actual views



To: Bonefish who wrote (1540783)5/30/2025 9:05:57 PM
From: sylvester802 Recommendations

Recommended By
rdkflorida2
Wharf Rat

  Respond to of 1586313
 
TACO trump MORONS: The AI Slop Scandal Around the MAHA Report Is Getting Worse
The AI Slop Scandal Around the MAHA Report Is Getting Worse

The White House wrote off the errors as

It came to light this week that a new government report from the "Make America Healthy Again" Commission led by Robert F Kennedy Jr. contained botched citations for scientific papers that didn't exist. This is almost certainly a sign that some form of generative AI was involved to draft a very consequential piece of medical agenda-setting, coming out of the US's top health agency, the Department of Health and Human Services.

Now, some additional reporting suggests that the paper's flaws go even deeper — yes, even deeper than allegedly relying on a technology known for making stuff up and then being surprised that it made stuff up.

But first, let's highlight how the White House finally decided to respond to the criticism of the report, which has been "very poorly and not convincingly at all."

On Thursday, the White House said that it would fix the errors in the government report — and it did, releasing a new version with corrected citations. But press secretary Karoline Leavitt also took the opportunity to construe the affair as the press getting worked up about a few errant typos.

"I understand there was some formatting issues with the MAHA report that are being addressed and the report will be updated," Leavitt told reporters during a press briefing, as quoted by the Associated Press. "But it does not negate the substance of the report."

"Minor citation and formatting errors have been corrected," HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon told the AP in a statement.

Led by noted anti-vaxxer and all-around crackpot RKF Jr., the "MAHA Report" purports to be a tell-all on why Americans, and especially children, are so unhealthy. Both Leavitt and Nixon described the report as "transformative."

That's a questionable claim. As NOTUS first reported on Thursday, several of the studies cited in the report do not exist at all, including one called "Overprescribing of Oral Corticosteroids for Children With Asthma," which was used to argue that doctors are giving kids too much medicine. This "study" has never been referenced anywhere outside the MAHA report. Lawyers have been sanctioned for similar behavior in court.

It gets dumber. The Washington Post found that 37 of the paper's 522 footnotes are inexplicably repeated multiple times. Some of the citations also include an "oaicite" appended to the URLs, which refers to OpenAI, the creators of ChatGPT. This is a "definitive sign" that the research was gathered using an AI, WaPo concluded.

And the flaws go beyond bogus citations, or "minor" perils of "formatting," in Leavitt's parlance. As experts told the NYT, some of the papers that were correctly cited were still inaccurately summarized — if in fact they weren't being deliberately misconstrued. The report argued, in one case, that a 40-fold increase in bipolar disorder and ADHD diagnoses in children between 1994 to 2003 was propelled by loosened criteria in a fifth edition of a guide used by psychiatrists, per the NYT. But that fifth edition, it turns out, didn't come out until 2013. And that "40-fold increase" the report touted appears to come from a 2007 study which makes zero mention of an uptick in ADHD.

Even if you could somehow excuse using an AI chatbot to help speed up composing what's supposed to be the cynosure of the US's public health policy going forward, the sheer levels of sloppiness on display can only leave you to conclude that either RFK and his lackeys have no idea what they're doing and have no business writing a serious scientific document, or that they're trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the American public, cynical enough to ask an AI model to conjure up studies to fit whatever narrative they're peddling.

"This is not an evidence-based report, and for all practical purposes, it should be junked at this point," Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, told WaPo. "It cannot be used for any policymaking. It cannot even be used for any serious discussion, because you can't believe what's in it."

The post The AI Slop Scandal Around the MAHA Report Is Getting Worse appeared first on Futurism.



To: Bonefish who wrote (1540783)5/30/2025 9:23:14 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 1586313
 
U.S. foreign tax bill sends jitters across Wall Street
U.S. foreign tax bill sends jitters across Wall Street
  • The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," includes the most sweeping changes to the tax treatment of foreign capital in the U.S. in decades under a provision known as Section 899.
  • Section 899 will hit entities from so-called "discriminatory foreign countries" that impose levies that disproportionately affect U.S. companies.
  • Under the new tax bill, the U.S. would hit investors from such countries by increasing taxes on U.S. income by 5 percentage points each year, potentially taking the tax rate up to 20%.
While U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs play out in U.S. courts, another one of his proposed laws could weaponize the American tax system.

Investment banks and law firms warn this step could prove to be as significant as the impact of duties on investors.

The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which passed through the U.S. House of Representatives last week, includes the most sweeping changes to the tax treatment of foreign capital in the U.S. in decades under a provision known as Section 899. The bill must still gain the Senate's approval.

"We see this legislation as creating the scope for the US administration to transform a trade war into a capital war if it so wishes," said George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank on Thursday.

"Section 899 challenges the open nature of US capital markets by explicitly using taxation on foreign holdings of US assets as leverage to further US economic goals," Saravelos added in the note to clients, under the subtitle "weaponization of US capital markets in to law."

Section 899 says it will hit entities from "discriminatory foreign countries" — those that impose levies such as the digital services taxes that disproportionately affect U.S. companies.

France, for instance, has a 3% tax on revenues from online platforms, which primarily targets big technology firms such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Germany is reportedly considering a similar tax of 10%.

What does the proposed tax do?Under the new tax bill, the U.S. would hit investors from such countries by increasing taxes on U.S. income by 5 percentage points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%.

Emmanuel Cau, head of European Equity Strategy at Barclays, suggested that the mere passage of the tax legislation could make dollar assets less valuable for foreign investors.

"In our view, this is a risk for those companies generating US revenues, and domiciled in countries that have enacted Digital Services Taxes (DST) or are implementing the OECD's Under Taxed Payment Rule (UTPR)," Cau said in a Friday note to clients.

He highlighted companies such as London-listed Compass Group, which provides catering services to U.S. schools, and InterContinental Hotels, which owns at least 25 luxury hotels in the U.S., are likely to be affected by the proposed law.

"Given US net international investment position is sharply negative, there is indeed scope for capital outflows if indeed S899 passes through the Senate in its current form," he added.

The impact of the bill won't be limited to European companies or individuals from those states.

The bill "could significantly increase tax rates applicable to certain non-U.S. individuals and business, governmental, and other entities," said Max Levine, head of U.S. tax at the law firm Linklaters.

This means it could also ensnare governments and central banks, which are large investors of U.S. Treasuries. France and Germany, for instance, held a combined $475 billion worth of U.S. government bonds as of March.

The proposed tax would lower returns on U.S. Treasuries for those investors as "the de facto yield on US Treasuries would drop by nearly 100bps," Deutsche Bank's Saravelos added. "The adverse impact on demand for USTs and funding the US twin deficit at a time when this is most needed is clear".

"It's very bad," said Beat Wittmann, chairman of Switzerland-based Porta Advisors. "This is huge — this is just one piece in the overall plan and it's completely consistent with what this administration is all about."

"The ultimate judge for this is not our opinions, it's the bond market," Wittmann added. "The U.S. bond market is discounting these developments, and we have seen in the last few weeks, that if there was a safe haven move, investors clearly prefer German bunds."

Large Australian pension funds with U.S. investments have also been reportedly concerned by the bill, since Australia operates a medicines subsidy scheme that is opposed by large U.S. pharmaceutical companies.

Legal experts at the Mayer Brown law firm suggest that "significant changes" could be made to the bill as it passes through the U.S. Senate before it's enshrined into law by Trump.

"As such, there may be questions about whether the provisions of the proposal that override tax treaties could be included in the US Senate's version of the tax bill," Mayer Brown's experts said.