Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1540925)	5/31/2025 8:32:01 PM
From: Maple MAGA	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1570634

You’ve just proven my point. Instead of addressing the argument, you default to slandering anyone who questions your preferred policies as a “sociopath” or “fossil fuel purveyor.” That’s not science, it’s moral posturing. You claim people “aren’t being forced to do anything,” yet your entire framework relies on coercion through policy, taxation, regulation, and the threat of noncompliance penalties. That is force. You just outsource it through bureaucracy and call it “saving the planet.” And no, Harvard and the AP are not people. They are institutions, often captured by group-think and funded by the very same interests pushing centralized climate agendas. Citing them as arbiters of truth doesn’t strengthen your argument, it exposes its fragility. If your ideas are sound, they shouldn’t need a moral bludgeon or institutional echo chamber to carry them. Just facts, logic, and respect for individual rights.