Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (42448)	2/24/1998 11:26:00 AM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Riley, It's funny how todays bogus trade coincides with that AOL posting. Remember my post on the EMail thread where I reproduced that bogus post from AOL?, this bogus trade is what that post predicted, if anybody doesn't think the MM's , especially the short MM's who are short and gonna have to join the fold in Making a Market in RMIL or cover, aren't scared, trying to purchase cheap shares, $.06 like GOPLUG, and aren't trying to corrupt the RMIL Market and squeeze before trading, are as CLUELESS as Reece.....I' sure hope REECE , the arrogant fool, took the time to call Colo., or , at least RMIL, to SEE WHAT THE REALITY OF THE SITUATION IS!!! That Bogus trade, like WEINS illegal activities, only DEMONSTRATE the reality of the squeeze and the desperation of their situation. Reece, who is here for academic exercise, chose the WRONG SIDE, being argumentitive is OK to blow time in a coffee house Reece, what you're doing here is taking your totally uninformed, party line rhetoric to scare people from gaining and profiting on their investment. Get a clue Reece, then get a life! Pugs RMIL SOLIDARITY BUSTING THE SHORT.......LEGALLY!!!!!

To: Riley G who wrote (42448)	2/24/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: Joe Master	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

" I bought 200 shares on Dec. 22nd, 1997. That trade was later canceled because we were halted at before the open that day." Looks like the SEC did you a favor and saved you $212 plus commisions.

To: Riley G who wrote (42448)	2/24/1998 5:57:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 55532

Riley, Are you trying to tell the thread that you were attempting to buy 200 shares at .50/share on 22 December, 1997 and your order would have been filled had it not been for the SEC trading halt?? Seems to me you normally work in larger numbers than a mere 200 shares. At least this is what I think you would like us to believe. Regards, Ron

To: Riley G who wrote (42448)	2/25/1998 12:38:00 AM
From: spinynorman1323	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 55532

Riley, Riley's Post... exchange2000.com "I called DLJ and they confirmed that it's a bogus trade." ______________ If you indeed called DLJ and they confirmed that the trade for 200 shares at 50 cents was a bogus trade, then either.... 1. DLJ is lying. 2. You are lying about what DLJ told you. 3. You did not call DLJ and therefore are lying about calling them. 4. The person you spoke to at DLJ was ignorant of the facts. or 5. We have different definitions of bogus. AND yes.....regardless of what lather you espouse.....RMIL is open for trading if and when an order is submitted, an intermediary (MM) is willing to broker the trade, and the terms of both parties (buy and sell side) are met. You (nor PUGS) cannot have both sides of this black and white issue. The 10 day administrative halt has passed. Unfortunately, for all practical purposes the return to regular OTCBB trading will not occur until RMIL has satisfied the SEC/NASD's requirement of an accurate and timely update of the current status of the company. But, as I have pointed out and what has surely been lost in the piffle on this thread, any of us could simply enter an order to test the waters.... exchange2000.com Everyone interested please do a quick read and let me know specifically where you misunderstand any points I made. There are numerous sources available to confirm whether or not trading via the pink sheets has occurred. Riley, you clearly stated that the trade of 200 shares at 50 cents was bogus. I checked Discover Brokerage, Schwab, DLJ, Reuters, and various online quote services. Each confirmed that a trade of 200 shares at 50 cents did indeed occur. Additionally I received confirmation from...dare I say...Nasdaq Market Surveillance...that a trade of 200 shares at 50 cents was reported via normal channels. Who is trying to scam whom? If an evil market maker decided to pad his/her pockets with the riches available from all these unsuspecting RMIL shareholders on such an irrelevant stock by attempting to shake their shares, what evidence can anyone provide that posting an "alleged" trade of 200 shares at 50 cents will succeed to that end? If those allegations are true, then we can certainly expect a flurry of activity of pink sheet trading as the weak RMIL longs dump their shares. Keep an eye on that one, Riley. I will double check the trading logs to save you some time. _____________ "WE ARE NOT OPEN FOR TRADING....yet Call those certificates, Riley G" _____________ So. My point here is....yes Mr. G, RMIL is "open" for trading if willing buyers and sellers can be matched. The problem is the illiquidity of the pink sheet market. The company HAS NO CONTROL over whether or not trading occurs via the pinks. For a healthy change, if you would throw a fact out of that psychic noggin of yours and onto this SI thread for all to consume, we could all just get along for a change. Simple enough, huh? BTW, all you yeas are 180 off on your evaluations of Mr. Reece. Riley, you are pathetic and pathological (IMO) and may be allegedly going out of your alleged simpleton mind, allegedly. And Angel D. What a revealing comment of yours regarding the turbin (sic). Mark DISCLAIMER: I understand that for some this whole charade may be for entertainment value only. My posts are directed to those who might care whether or not they lose the money they have invested in OVIS/RMIL.