SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Chevron -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robert b furman who wrote (112)6/4/2025 3:12:13 PM
From: Selectric II1 Recommendation

Recommended By
robert b furman

  Respond to of 119
 
Since XOM wrote the agreement, I lean to their interpretation of the JV to win.


As a general rule, ambiguous terms or terms capable of multiple interpretations in a contract are construed against the drafter.

OTOH, they may have included language to negate that rule of construction.

This should be interesting, to say the least.



To: robert b furman who wrote (112)6/10/2025 11:56:08 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 119
 
Every now and then someone writes something incisive. Here’s an example, IMO.

maritime-executive.com

Question: if XOM wins its suit against CVX, does CNOC get to participate in the Hess asset? Hope not.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News