Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : GTIS - Will it be a Phoenix or not ? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Miller who wrote (1549)	2/24/1998 12:25:00 PM
From: John	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2319

Scott, Thanks for answering my question about Max Payne. I have the following request, since you all have creative control over the movie please DO NOT let the following actors play duke. Keannu Reeves, Dolf Langren, Val Kilmner, Jean Claude Van Dam, Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Sylvestor Stallone. --------------------------------------------------------- My vote is still for Tim Thomerson. BTW - did you watch him in dollman yet? He would be perfect for the part. He's tougher than Clint Eastwood, and not very well known outside the B-Movies scene. I don't think you should get a really "big" star to play the part - you need someone that nobody has seen before, someone who will not be associated in the audiences mind with previous roles that they have played. JV.

To: Scott Miller who wrote (1549)	2/24/1998 9:25:00 PM
From: Chris McConnel	Respond to of 2319

>>> Why did GTIS let G.O.D. have Max Payne, I thought they had first dibs on it? Didn't they like the game? >> Sure they did, but Gathering of Developer's offer was too tough to match. GTIS only had the right to match any outside offer. Huhn. Oh really? Since you sit on G.O.D.'s board does that mean your offer to yourself was just too good to pass up? If this is so, is Duke 5 in the same situation? And I'm curious, did you check with your corporate lawyer before making these posts? Since you sit on the board of a competitor and are providing content for GTIS, your forward-looking statements could be easily misconstrued as stock manipulation. Aren't you little bit concerned that the SEC maybe scaning these boards?