Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BlueCrab who wrote (8063)	2/24/1998 1:52:00 PM
From: username	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

TAFKA<[]>: OK, since you have decided not to pursue it, and as per clause 64, paragraph 3: (and I quote:) "...should recipient of said moniker fail to make proper and timely use (empasis mine) of said moniker, or fail in timely payments of royalties (emphasis mine) to [fill in all royalty recipients here], all rights and privileges pertaining thereto and henceforth forever until the end of time shall revert to and be reconvened and readjusted with and upon the former (original) inventor of said moniker, to do with as he may see fit so to speak..." Unfortuanately, I don't know what to do with it either, but I see some light at the end of the barbacoa. If you would occasionally refer to yourself as "TAFKA<[]>" in a public forum, I see no actual cause to bring in the barristers. As an example, during May, you could refer to yourself thusly; TAFKA<[o\|o]>, and it seems to me that the spirit of the agreement would be upheld. warmest regards, pete