SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1543147)6/16/2025 11:55:40 PM
From: Maple MAGA 3 Recommendations

Recommended By
golfer72
longz
miraje

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575622
 
Calling someone a sociopath for emphasizing adaptation over politically charged mitigation-only approaches is exactly the kind of emotional overreaction that’s undermining rational climate policy. The reality is: the climate is changing, regardless of whether we cut emissions today or not, and adaptation is not just wise, it's unavoidable.

Even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is often cited by alarmists, explicitly emphasizes the importance of adaptation. In the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (2022), Working Group II states:

'Even with deep emissions reductions, some degree of climate change is inevitable, and adaptation will be necessary to address its impacts.'

In other words, humans must prepare for floods, fires, droughts, heat, and migration—no matter how much CO2 we cut.

Moreover, efforts to ‘stabilize the atmosphere’ by controlling global temperatures to within 1.5°C is not a scientific certainty, it’s a political goal. The Earth’s climate system is incredibly complex and not fully predictable. Climate scientist Judith Curry puts it well:

'The climate system is not a thermostat, and trying to control it like one through carbon policy is both arrogant and futile.'

Instead of pouring trillions into unproven global mitigation schemes, we need to diversify strategies—strengthen infrastructure, improve forecasting, protect water systems, and invest in agricultural resilience. That’s not denialism, it’s intelligent risk management.

Climate shouldn’t be a religion or a weapon. It’s a reality. And rational adaptation isn’t sociopathy, it’s survival.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1543147)6/17/2025 11:36:58 AM
From: Eric1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Doren

  Respond to of 1575622
 
Well...

Again it's just a display of massive ignorance on his part sadly.

Maybe he works in the fossil fuel industry and doesn't want to lose his job which is inevitable.

A terminal situation with RE displacing more and more of it every day.