SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (215007)6/17/2025 10:51:05 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217573
 
23 min ago

Missile defense systems provided by US are helping save lives in Israel, ambassador says

From CNN's Brad Lendon and Maureen Chowdhury
Israeli Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter told CNN today that the US-provided missile defense systems, including THAAD, have helped save “hundreds perhaps thousands of lives” in Israel since Iran began its retaliatory missile attacks four days ago.

Here’s why the missile defense system is effective:

  • The Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) battery is one of the US military’s most powerful anti-missile weapons, capable of intercepting ballistic missiles at ranges of 150 to 200 kilometers (93 to 124 miles) and with a near-perfect success rate in testing.
  • Using a combination of advanced radar systems and interceptors, it is the only US missile defense system that can engage and destroy short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles both inside or outside the atmosphere during their terminal phase of flight — or dive on their target.
  • THAAD interceptors are kinetic, meaning they take out incoming targets by colliding with them rather than exploding near the incoming warhead.

According to a report by the Congressional Research Service, the US military has seven THAAD batteries, each consisting of six truck-mounted launchers — with eight interceptors apiece — a powerful radar system and a fire control and communications component.

Through a broad command and control and battle management system, THAAD batteries can communicate with a range of US missile defenses, including Aegis systems — commonly found aboard US Navy ships — and Patriot missile defense systems that are designed to intercept shorter-range targets. Those other missile defense systems are more numerous than THAAD.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (215007)6/17/2025 10:57:27 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217573
 
15-ton mega bomb needed to destroy Iran’s last nuclear facility – here’s why Israel can’t deliver it.

By
Michael Kaplan

Published June 17, 2025, 6:18 p.m. ET

Israel needs a 15-ton ‘bunker buster’ bomb to destroy the last untouched nuclear facility in Iran, but only the US has one.

Such a powerful weapon – the largest non-nuclear bomb in the US arsenal – is needed because the target, Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, is built some 300 feet inside a mountain near the city of Qom, two hours south of Tehran.

The heavyweight explosive is known as a GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator and was designed by Boeing for the United States Air Force.

Its huge weight means it can only be delivered with a B-2 Spirit stealth bomber – a jet Israel’s air force does not possess.

6
The above illustration shows how bunker busters penetrate concrete before exploding inside.Merrill Sherman / NY Post Design

Continue watchingThis Day in Historyafter the ad

6
John Spencer was in proximity to a bunker buster much smaller than than the one that may be used in Iran. He described the experience as “teeth rattling.”Courtesy of John Spencer

“The United States controls the bomber and the bomb,” John Spencer, chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point military academy, told The Post. “It would be an American plane and an American munition.”

The missile cost over $500 million for the US Army to develop, and was built to specifications which would allow it to penetrate deep enough into the Fordow plant to destroy the nuclear centrifuges in the complex, according to a 2013 article in the Wall Street Journal, which said at that time 20 of the bombs had been manufactured for the US military.

If the US does opt to help Israel with this extraordinarily powerful weapon, it will almost certainly turn the nuclear facility, protected by layers of granite and steel, to rubble.

6
An early prototype of the GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb in a picture released by the Department of Defense.
6
A GBU-57 bomb, the very thing that may drop in Iran, at Whiteman Air Base in Missouri.AP
6
A different type of “Bunker Buster” bomb, the 5000-pound GBU-37 being inspected by a soldier at a US air force base.REUTERS“By weight and kinetic force, the GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator is designed to penetrate a certain amount of distance into the ground before it blows,” said Spencer.

“That’s why these bunker busters are called Penetrators. They penetrate the ground before they explode. The explosion is strategically delayed.”

Although the US has sold less powerful bunker buster weapons to Israel, they have declined to share the Massive Ordnance Penetrator with any of its allies, partly to ensure it retains an upper hand, according to various reports.

As to what an explosion from a Massive Ordnance Penetrator would feel like, Spencer can only guess. “I’ve seen 500 pounders, and they’ll shake your teeth when they go off. It’s like an earthquake. This will be much more than that.”

However, minimizing the likelihood of a nuclear explosion or leak, said Spencer, “this [explosion] is pretty contained,” He explained that since the bunker buster explodes so far underground, under such strong armor, it is unlikely to cause a nuclear reaction. Instead of breaking through the surface, rubble would cave in. “The risk is for leakage, not an explosion.”

6
A B-2 Spirit, the stealth jet that carries state-of-the-art bunker busters.REUTERSUS intelligence has long agreed Fordow is strategic to disabling the Iranian nuclear program.

“If you don’t get Fordow, you haven’t eliminated their ability to produce weapons-grade material,” Brett McGurk, who served as Middle East coordinator for several American presidents of both parties, recently told the New York Times.

In a less than ideal scenario, a state-of-the-art bunker buster is not the only solution.

874What do you think? Post a comment.

It’s also possible, said Spencer, that, without help from the US, Israel could do a jerry rigged attack on Fordow.

“Israel has cornered the market on what they call drilling,” said Spencer. “They drop one bomb that reaches a certain depth, then another and another, at different angles, within seconds, to get to where they want to go. But you put multiple people and multiple aircraft at risk. The GBU is one and done.”

Considering that option, Spencer concluded, “There are many ways to destroy the nuclear program in Iran. But this is the effective and efficient one. It gets to the objective quicker and is the perfect solution.”