Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (1544747)	6/24/2025 5:42:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570355

Eric, We know all the 60% purity U235 was not there. Quite frankly, I don't know what to believe regarding Iran's uranium enrichment levels. Didn't matter to me, though. I never trusted them with commercial-grade uranium just for power-generation. Let's assume, however, that Iran does indeed have hundreds of kilograms of 60% U-235, which is just a few weeks away from weapons grade. There is no way to eliminate that stockpile from the air alone. We'd have to send in the ground troops, Iraq-style, and even then, we still wouldn't be able to find it. I don't know how long it would take for Iran to rebuild their centrifuges. And we certainly may never know whether Iran's current underground facilities were destroyed. (If I were Iran, I'd start driving a lot of supply vehicles to and from the nuclear facilities just to PRETEND for the satellite cameras that they're still up and running.) One thing we do know, however, is just how powerful the Israeli Air Force is, and how big Trump's 30,000 lb. bunker-busting testicles are. Given that Iran was heavily dependent on RuZZian air defenses, that's gotta be nothing but bad news for PooTin and his armada of cucks. Tenchusatsu