Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1545156)

6/26/2025 6:38:20 PM

From: Brumar89

Respond to of 1570332

After the latest NATO summit wrapped up in the Netherlands, Donald Trump received the kind of headlines the president likes to see. “Trump tallies wins as he leaves NATO summit,” Politico reported. The headline from the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal, a frequent target for the Republican, declared, “Trump Wins the Battle of NATO.”

But as the dust settles on the international gathering, did the American president get what it wanted out of NATO, or did NATO get what it wanted out of him? The Washington Post’s summary stood out:

For those familiar with Trump’s long-held perspective on the international alliance, the comments were as unexpected as they were refreshing. The Republican has railed against NATO for years, hinting at a possible U.S. withdrawal, questioning its value and utility — at one point even threatening to let Russia do “whatever the hell” it wants to our ostensible partners and allies.

As recently as a few days ago — literally earlier this week — Trump was repeatedly asked whether he was committed to honoring Article 5 of the NATO charter, which is a security guarantee that treats an attack on one NATO member as an attack on the alliance as a whole. As the Post reported, the Republican refused to answer directly

“It depends on your definition,” the president told reporters before arriving in the Netherlands. “There’s numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?”

Two days later, at the international summit, he was asked again for his position on Article 5. “I stand with it,” Trump replied, offering a better answer than he has in years past. He added, “If I didn’t stand with it, I wouldn’t be here.” In separate remarks, Trump also said, in reference to NATO, “We’re with them all the way.”

The American president later said in reference to the NATO alliance, “I left here a little bit different. ... I left here differently.”

Of course, to know anything about Trump is to know that it’s important to focus more on what he does than on what he says, and it’s entirely possible that he’ll soon forget all of his new praise and compliments in the coming days.

But Trump’s previous appearances at NATO gatherings have been challenging and difficult, especially for traditional U.S. allies, so many sighed with relief when the American president not only failed to throw any tantrums during the latest summit, but left with nothing but nice things to say.

As for how NATO members managed to pull this off, the obvious answer is that member nations agreed to significantly increase domestic defense spending, in line with the White House’s wishes; but not every country endorsed the goal, and it’ll be years before anyone gets close to reaching the new targets.

Partners also excelled by figuring out what Trump wanted — that is, pampering and genuflecting flattery — and giving it to him, at no cost to the alliance. Bloomberg News reported:

It was against this backdrop that Rutte, at one point, even referred to Trump as “ daddy.”

Was it embarrassing? Probably, but it was also effective. Trump showed a newfound respect for NATO; he appeared to commit to Article 5 in ways he’d avoided just a couple of days earlier; and he even left open the possibility of at least some U.S. security aid to Ukraine.

The American president appeared quite pleased with the summit, but given the circumstances, NATO leaders and members were even more delighted.

This article was originally published on MSNBC.com