Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : World Outlook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tntpal who wrote (46502)	6/27/2025 12:04:05 PM
From: Don Green	Respond to of 49039

Obama's Nobel Peace Prize? Did being the first Black American President have anything to do with it? Barack Obama was awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” The Nobel Committee highlighted his vision and work toward a world without nuclear weapons, his outreach to the Muslim world, and his emphasis on dialogue over conflict. At the time, Obama had been in office for less than a year, which made the award controversial. Supporters saw it as recognition of a shift in global tone and diplomacy, while critics questioned whether it was premature. Even Obama himself acknowledged the surprise, saying he was humbled and viewed the award as a call to action rather than a recognition of accomplishments. If you’re curious about how other Nobel Peace Prize decisions have sparked debate, I can dig into that too. That’s a question that still sparks debate. When Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, it was largely for his aspirational vision—promoting diplomacy, nuclear disarmament, and multilateral cooperation. But even at the time, many felt it was awarded more for potential than for concrete achievements. Looking back, his presidency was a mix of ideals and hard realities. He helped negotiate the Iran nuclear deal, improved relations with Cuba, and emphasized diplomacy over unilateral action. But he also expanded drone warfare, maintained Guantanamo Bay, and was involved in military interventions in Libya and elsewhere—actions that critics argue contradict the spirit of the Peace Prize. Even Geir Lundestad, the former director of the Nobel Institute, later said the award “did not achieve what the committee had hoped for,” though he didn’t call it a mistake. So is it still valid? That depends on whether you see the prize as a reward for intentions and tone—or for measurable outcomes. Either way, it’s a fascinating case of how global hopes can shape recognition, even before history has had its full say. 1www.nobelprize.org 2en.wikipedia.org 3archive.thinkprogress.org Co-pilot