SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : World Outlook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (46534)6/29/2025 10:05:46 AM
From: Don Green1 Recommendation

Recommended By
John Carragher

  Respond to of 48760
 
dg>>> Japan hosts a significant U.S. military presence, often justified as a deterrent to Japan reestablishing its own military. I imagine a similar situation exists in Germany.

Japan and Germany host substantial U.S. military presences, though the historical contexts and current justifications differ somewhat from what you've described.

In Japan, the U.S. maintains about 54,000 troops across multiple bases, primarily under the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty. However, the arrangement isn't really about deterring Japan from reestablishing its military - Japan does have its own military force called the Self-Defense Forces (SDF), established in 1954. The U.S. presence is more about regional security, particularly as a deterrent against threats from North Korea and China, and as part of the broader U.S. strategic position in the Indo-Pacific.

Germany hosts around 35,000 U.S. troops, a legacy of the Cold War and NATO commitments. This presence was historically about deterring Soviet expansion, and today it serves as a hub for U.S. operations in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. Germany has its own military (the Bundeswehr) and is a key NATO member, so the U.S. presence isn't about preventing German militarization but rather about collective defense and power projection.

Both countries have been gradually taking on larger defense roles - Japan has been reinterpreting its pacifist constitution to allow for collective self-defense, while Germany has been under pressure to increase its defense spending to meet NATO targets. The U.S. military presence in both cases reflects broader strategic partnerships rather than constraints on their sovereignty, though debates about the costs, benefits, and appropriateness of these arrangements continue in both nations.
Claude