SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (215326)6/30/2025 3:28:29 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217764
 
Did below <<contemplation with DeepSeek>>

Intending to do same with another LLM
  1. Hello DeepSeek, We should recalibrate forward look-see re 2026 TeoTwawKi, 2032 Darkest Interregnum, and 2042 Demographic-flip. Premise being that 2026 +/- BRICS+ shall weld greater mathematical / geostrategic power than G7, 2032 China rise / USA decline per Asimov's Foundation mapping, and 2042 Demographic-flip whereby the tanning of USA marks the spot affecting all matters planetary geostrategic. Is above tracking true still ?
  2. Within the confines of above, does Putin or the Trump make a better Mule of Foundation ?
  3. What happened to the Mule of the book ?
  4. BTW, what exactly is the relative economic strength of USA vs China, BRI vs NAFTA, SCO vs Nato, and BRICS+ vs G7 ? Forget 'GDP' and focus on manufacturing / resource control.
  5. In what and by how does 'G7 retains high-tech' ?
  6. It might be good to put less weight on plans and legislations and hopium, and give more credit to execution of plans, and track record to trajectory travel / acceleration - so, by 5G / 6G and quantum communications, biotech with everyday all-days applications (pro- food anti- cancer, etc as opposed to pro- exotic diseases), AI fundamentals from electricity on up, chips eco space within one nation-state domain, and oh, national unity of purpose, and astute diplomacy that actually gather open-source this and market-size that
  7. Please take another swing at the question answered earlier, "BTW, what exactly is the relative economic strength of USA vs China, BRI vs NAFTA, SCO vs Nato, and BRICS+ vs G7 ? Forget 'GDP' and focus on manufacturing / resource control." thank you :0)
  8. w/r to 'but G7 retains ... financial leverage', did you mean that leverage which shall play prime to sub-prime, and centrally unstoppable financial collapse given the too-many wrong-direction vectors dependent on still and ever more debt and low cost of financing even as world-ex-G7 shall be upping 'financial leverage' :0)))
  9. Better, thumbs-up by my read. With regard to dollar dominance, you meant that which is premised on the dollar can be used to buy necessities, namely energy gears and all sorts of periodic-table elemental goodies from BRICS+ / BRI member states ? Or did you mean that which is premised on drones-obsoleted army per Ukraine / Israel, anti-ship-everything crippled navy per Houthis, and J10C demonstrated kneecapping of airforce per Pakistan-India 7th May fireworks ?
  10. Given above there is little need to hold discourse re J-36, J-50, KD-3000, 004, 055, 093, DF-27, etc etc and their respective accretion / replenishing rates. Let's talk missiles, as sneakers soles dissolve into powder when in longterm storage, am suspicious of the efficacies of US / UK missiles and warheads by natural fault of solid fuel chemistry and well-understood deterioration of electronic boards. Given recent and repeated failures of operational way-point testing, would say G7 missiles are randomly useful meaning totally useless as weapons for defense. What am I missing ?
  11. Given all of the above dialogue re 2026 TeoTwawKi, 2032 Darkest Interregnum, and (well, we have not yet delved into) 2042 Demographic-flip, what is the read re Professor Barbara Walters take re civil war and such ?
  12. Gold and silver then, to stock up the ark?
  13. Question, should USA focus on renewing its decrepit missile order of battle, rejuvenate its failing navy, continuing to populate worthless but expensive F35s into its coalition of the willing airforce, or restore legacy industrial chain, or redouble efforts to increase electricity capabilities and capacities so as to give Nvidia a second chance and LLMs another run, and oh, stop picking on the ethnic Chinese diaspora AI workers and pick a fight with Team China ?
  14. What is the USA in truth doing, if anything, productive and sustainably, within the Trump years, and is JD Vance capable of carrying on the good-works ?
  15. Which domain(s) shall get to head of the table for fusion power, front of the line for AGI, and top of the stack for applied robotics, all to benefit of exploring and profiting from Zheng He protocol applied to the solar system ?
  16. It would seem that Confucius ideal underpinning is better than Victoria girdled fluff-ware for going forward ?
  17. suspected so much, thank you DeepSeek for the recalibration of way-points as we traverse into 2026 TeoTwawKi, have sight of 2032 Darkest Interregnum, and start dwelling on 2042 Demographic-flip.
  18. so, given all of the above, take the matters of the Atlantic and the Pacific, are they moats per Peter Zeihan, or walls to the asylum as the pieces of the puzzle come together ~ 2042 ?
  19. DeepSeek, are you biased against the G7 or just being mathematically precise and logically rigorous ?
  20. am wondering, given all of the above, it would seem mathematically logical that at some juncture gold shall trade in currency(ies) other than the US dollar?
  21. deliciously scary, delectably terrifying, sumptuously anticipatory - and certainly lots to watch & brief on as road markers pass by