Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (341279)

7/15/2025 7:40:54 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362824

Fish are one of the easiest things to see GW. The fish are moving north to warmer waters.

In fact for the first time ever, salmon are migrating up rivers that flow into the arctic ocean.

Inuit report seeing fish they have never seen before.

And the science is well known.

It used to be mainly arctic char, but now all five species of salmon have been found in the rivers.

<

o: i-node who wrote (341237)	7/15/2025 2:01:45 PM
From: combjelly	1 Recommendation of 341305

Oh please. All of the data is corrupted and has been for centuries by shadowy forces you imagine... Godz. Climate can and does change. Are you familiar with those Zone Hardiness maps that smart gardeners use? They are updated every decade or so, but if you look at them over the decades, assuming you can understand them, you will note that they have been creeping northwards since they were first created. Now I suppose you can argue that the data has been cooked, but that is supported by commercial growers of, among other things, stone fruits. Whose fruiting and the quality of the resulting fruit, is dependent on chill hours. Now the production of stone fruits has been shifting northward for decades. Now it very well may be that the growers have been roped in and are voluntarily taking on economic damage to further the charade, but... The fact that it is consistent with the science is just another example of how deep the corruption runs. At some point, you cross over from conspiracy theories to outright lunacy.

To: combjelly who wrote (341279)	7/15/2025 11:08:38 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362824

>>The fact that it is consistent with the science is just another example of how deep the corruption runs. At some point, you cross over from conspiracy theories to outright lunacy. The science has been and continues to be slop. Your name calling notwithstanding, the fact is that the number of extinctions over time has been relatively stable, as my precious post reflected. You can raise hell, but I believe the best analyses of the science came from the late Freeman Dyson and have yet to be convinced by anyone his analysis is wrong. And I believe on topic, your topic, you are once again proved wrong.