Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (341381)	7/16/2025 1:50:12 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 362953

The solution isn't all that complicated; over time, just replace all fossil fuels with clean electricity. The solutions are always simple to those who don't have to implement the systems. There exist a remarkably small number of people with the mind and tenacity to convert your "simple" solution to actionable trillion dollar operations. Keep in mind, that while Obama was spewing money to no end on the "climate change agenda" and Solyndra, Musk was planning and executing a plan to actually do something. This is the difference between entrepreneurship and government bureaucrats. They both spend money, but government does NOTHING with it but line the pockets of ever more bureaucrats. Unfortunately, the "new knowledge" you refer to may or may not stand the test of time. This is how the scientific method works. The problem is that everyone is too busy trying to find something to hang their names on that no one is doing the hard stuff of checking the work of others. Feynman famously addressed this issue, that which is relying on the science of others rather than trying to replicate it. No fun redoing someone else's work so you can put THEIR name on it! But it is an essential part of the process.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (341381)	7/16/2025 10:41:28 PM
From: bentway	1 Recommendation Recommended By CentralParkRanger Respond to of 362953

Other than clean, renewable electricity, great progress can be made with making the devices that use the electricity more efficient. LED lights are a great example. LED (Light Emitting Diode) lights are significantly more energy-efficient than traditional incandescent bulbs, using 75-90% less energy to produce the same amount of light. This efficiency translates to substantial energy savings and reduced electricity bills. Here's a more detailed breakdown: Energy Consumption: LEDs convert a much larger percentage of electrical energy into light (around 80-90%) compared to incandescent bulbs, which primarily produce heat. Incandescent bulbs waste about 90% of their energy as heat. Lifespan: LEDs also have a much longer lifespan, lasting up to 25 times longer than incandescent bulbs. Cost Savings: Although LEDs may have a higher upfront cost, their energy efficiency and longevity lead to significant long-term cost savings. Environmental Impact: Due to their lower energy consumption and longer lifespan, LEDs have a smaller environmental footprint. Comparison: A 9-watt LED bulb can produce the same amount of light as a 60-watt incandescent bulb. Other benefits: LEDs are also known for their durability, instant-on capability, and ability to be dimmed or produce different colors.