Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (42507)	2/24/1998 5:37:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Off Topic. That was not a Hard bite from you, it's more like a toothless gumming. Solidarity, Riley G PS. Back in lurking and investigative mode of the MM and their spooks. T Plus 10 million dollars and counting...

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (42507)	2/24/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Subject: Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. (GRNO) \| Previous \| Next \| Respond \| You have 9 unread messages To: Ron Reece (7398 ) From: John Hensley Wednesday, Oct 8 1997 12:53PM EST Reply # of 8824 Ron, Ron, Ron, my internet friend Ron. Boy oh boy <<I'm either very stupid (quite possibly)>>. Your words, not mine, but you sure openned yourself up to greater scrutiny. A slap on the wrist to you and restitution, not legal fees and aggravations. As for the Bo O'brien saga, well it sure looks like a huge conflict of interest and pump and dump to me. Since I'm not a lawyer, I look at things with common sense. There are clearly violations here, and if I were the SEC would I have done? I think closing trading is an extreme action, and a press release forcing GRNO to admit their alliances with Mr. O'brien and Mr. Reece were in order. I don't think the limited partners getting discounts on their purchases for referrals is a big deal, but there should have been some type of contract (I'm assuming there isn't one). However, looking back at the 4 reasons to halt trading, there is no mention to the development of the company's products and business including the testing. Either these were bogus to begin with or another shoe will drop. As for the sanctions, it appears to me that the Company will consent to not violate the SEC provisions? Does this say they agree not to break the law in the future? Is it that simple? As for Mr. Carraway, if this is the entire case, a permanent ban seems very harsh, and it obviously would affect the performance of the company greatly.