SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : All Things Weather and Mother Nature -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Green who wrote (784)7/18/2025 9:54:55 PM
From: Thomas A Watson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 926
 
Groc has different modes, There are 3 I believe, mod 1 lies and make it as much as the alternative, Mode 2 does more passes of analysis and lies and makes up less, Mode 3 thinking much is more compute intensive and proves to itself it is not lying and does not make it up. Has any MSM reported on this.?

Somewhere there is a video of the evolution of this paper. I saw it but cannot find it again. I am looking.

Do all non thinking AI have commandments programed into them???

scienceofclimatechange.org

Summary: .


rok 3 beta et al.: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attributes observed climate variability primarily to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. This conclusion relies heavily on adjusted datasets and outputs from global climate models (GCMs) within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) framework. However, this study conducts a rigorous evaluation of these assertions by juxtaposing them against unadjusted observational data and synthesizing findings from recent peer-reviewed literature. Our analysis reveals that human CO2 emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating negligible long-term atmospheric retention.

Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on a single, low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments.

We conclude that the anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.

Continue reading …

In my opinion this conclusion was summed up by President Trump very early in his first campaign ...

Climate Change Crisis is BULL SHIT.



To: Don Green who wrote (784)7/18/2025 10:55:00 PM
From: Thomas A Watson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 926
 
I found it. I searched Youtube with keywords and got noting. So I went to Tom Nelson channel and then scanned and found how the grok authored paper created. It long and willie soon is brillian but is meandering mind presenter. The listen was painful but worth it. So what is the disclaimer for every Glowbal Warming vid on youtube, Is this a LAW the YouTube Search AI uses to exclude videos from and search terms.????

So if Grok in thinking mode is like having phd's in everything and this is what it says what does is say about who are the real genuine certified SCIENCE DENIER'S No one will challenge this. They will ignore it and bury it.

New Study by Grok & Scientists Challenges CO2’s Role in Global Warming | Tom Nelson Pod #288



The YouTube Disclaimer.

United Nations • Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. Human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas.



To: Don Green who wrote (784)7/19/2025 10:09:33 AM
From: Don Green  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 926
 
Thomas

So, you don't agree with Grok? I assume you noticed that I shared four responses to your thoughts from four different and competing platforms for precisely the reason you mentioned. Interesting they all seem to have the same point of view as Grok?

Other sources
Grok, Gemini, Claude, and ChatGPT.

I am not disagreeing with your thoughts I am just providing what seems to be a strong counterpoint to your thoughts. Ball is in your court!