To: Don Green  who wrote (784 ) 7/18/2025 9:54:55 PM From: Thomas A Watson  1 RecommendationRecommended By  longz
    Read Replies (1)  | Respond to    of 926  Groc has different modes,   There are 3 I believe, mod 1 lies and make it as much as the alternative, Mode 2 does more passes of analysis and lies and makes up less,  Mode 3 thinking much is more compute intensive and proves to itself it is not lying and does not make it up.     Has any MSM reported on this.? Somewhere there is a video of the evolution of this paper.  I saw it but cannot find it again.  I am looking. Do all non thinking AI have commandments programed into them???   scienceofclimatechange.org  Summary:   .   rok 3 beta et al.: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis The  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attributes observed  climate variability primarily to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. This  conclusion relies heavily on adjusted datasets and outputs from global  climate models (GCMs) within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project  (CMIP) framework. However, this study conducts a rigorous evaluation of  these assertions by juxtaposing them against unadjusted observational  data and synthesizing findings from recent peer-reviewed literature. Our  analysis reveals that human CO2 emissions, constituting a mere 4% of  the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic  signatures and residence time data indicating negligible long-term  atmospheric retention. Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006),  CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to  replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends,  exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted  records. A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on a single,  low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the  existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options  align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data  adjustments. We conclude that the anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming  hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural  drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability,  necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.  Continue reading …  In my opinion this conclusion was summed up by President Trump very early in his first campaign ... Climate Change Crisis is BULL SHIT.