Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Natural Resource Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Julius Wong who wrote (108184)	7/20/2025 1:11:18 PM
From: isopatch	4 Recommendations Recommended By IC720 Julius Wong roguedolphin SirWalterRalegh Respond to of 108577

Hope others reading this board take a serious look at the stocks you rec & buy them IF their own analysis agrees No one should every buy a stock based on a web rec., even one of mine.<g> FWIW, I'm not interested because: 1. I'm already fully invested 2. Have never had much interest in new, lo priced, "concept stocks". Though noticed for many decades such stocks are favs of highly credentialed academics like my nephew B.S. MIT, Ph'd Univ of Pa & a Wharton MBA. In a long successful career, as a full time professional investor, started with almost nothing. Since 2004 have lived a wealthy privileged life style solely because of huge life time gains from. Almost never see that among academics. My hi MENSA IQ nephew (common in my AWA my wife's family) was given a million dollars to manage by his billionaire asian Indian father-in-law. Followed his picks closely but was careful not to interfere or even comment. He lost over 20% the 1st yr. with no posted updates thereafter. 2. Only reaffirmed my focus on well established cyclical companies in sectors where I've specialized since 1973. That said, want to emphasize there's always been multiple paths to making a fortune. Sincerely hope you've made one too. All the best, my friend Iso